How to Choose the Best AI Model for OpenClaw

Feb 24, 2026 · 2 min read · 421 Words · -Views -Comments · AI Tutorials

I’ve been using OpenClaw for a few weeks now and I love it. It’s become part of my daily high-frequency workflow. As my usage grows, tokens get consumed quickly. After testing various AI models and services, here’s a summary of my current AI service combination along with their pros and cons for reference.

AI Services I Currently Subscribe To

  1. ChatGPT Plus
  2. Claude Pro
  3. MiniMax Coding Plan — Sign up here
    • I’m on the 29 RMB/month plan, used mainly as a fallback.
    • Using the referral code above gets you a 10% discount and Builder status.
    • One extra advantage of MiniMax is that its plans include image and voice generation, which Claude and GPT don’t offer.

For specific pricing and payment details, search within this site for the relevant articles.

How I Use Them

  1. GPT uses the Codex OAuth method. For the model, just go with the latest Codex model.
  2. Claude Code isn’t officially supported, but since it’s a CLI tool, it can be used as a subagent — for example, I use it for writing articles.
  3. MiniMax supports OAuth. For the model, just pick the latest MiniMax M2.7.
    openclaw plugins enable minimax-portal-auth
    

So why did I ultimately choose these AI services? Because I tried several others but found drawbacks that made me give up on them. Here are a few examples.

How About Claude Models? ❌

The best option would be Claude’s Opus, but it’s too expensive, and API payment has a high barrier, so I gave up. Also, Claude Code doesn’t offer OAuth, so while you can use it via CLI, it can’t serve as OpenClaw’s base model.

How About DeepSeek Models? ❌

Compared to GPT, it performs poorly — stability is terrible. Currently I think it’s okay for single-task execution agents like translation, but for handling logic — such as acting as an agent dispatcher/manager — forget it, it’s just too weak. In actual use, it’s not as good as MiniMax.

Final Thoughts

All things considered, monthly AI spending comes to a few hundred RMB — not super expensive, but not cheap either. For me, it’s mainly about improving efficiency and saving time, so I find it acceptable. If better AI services emerge in the future, I’ll continue experimenting and adjusting my AI service combination to achieve a better experience and cost-effectiveness.

Authors
Developer, digital product enthusiast, tinkerer, sharer, open source lover